flag de flag gb flag fr
Legal notice     European Milk Board ASBL | Rue de la Loi 155 | B-1040 Bruxelles

News Details

PDF-Icon Icon-Print


Dairy sector remains significantly in the red

Milk prices cover only 59 percent and 67 percent of production costs in the Netherlands and Germany respectively

Brussels, 16.01.2017: As current figures prove, the situation for milk producers has not improved sufficiently. For example, the association Büro für Agrarsoziologie und Landwirtschaft (BAL) reported a cost price of 44.96 cents/kg milk for the Netherlands in the third quarter. This is contrasted by an average milk price of just about 26.70 cents in the three-month period from July to October. As a result, production cost coverage is at only 59 percent in the Dutch dairy sector. These figures stem from an ongoing study that provides production costs in different European countries on the basis of EU data. According to this study, a similar problem is affecting Germany as well. Figures up to October report costs of 44.77 cents and an average price of 30.05 cents/kg milk, which implies cost coverage of only 67 percent.

Dramatic situation raises questions

Such a situation begs the following important questions: How could it come to the current state of affairs where almost a third of production costs have not been covered for more than two years? Can sustainable, viable milk production continue to exist nationally and in Europe? How can the situation be improved on dairy farms that have taken a heavy toll and how can such a catastrophe be prevented in the future?

Romuald Schaber, German dairy farmer and President of the European milk-producer organisation EMB (European Milk Board), is among those providing answers to these questions: "We must be clear about one thing. Milk production can find some way or the other to survive in the short term. However, under the current conditions, we must forget about sustainable and viable production. There is no other profession facing a comparable situation in terms of income. Many milk producers are going to give up their activity or sink even deeper into debt. Entire production regions risk becoming completely deserted." This shortfall in cost coverage has negative effects on animal welfare as well. According to Schaber, the primary objective must be to maintain a balance between supply and demand on the dairy market in the future, so that cost-covering producer prices can finally be achieved. 

How can the situation possibly be improved?

Sieta van Keimpema, EMB Vice-president and President of the Dutch association DDB, sees the implementation of the so-called Market Responsibility Programme (MRP) as the only possible way to improve the situation. "Prices on the milk market are so low because of the lack of a crisis instrument. The MRP, nonetheless, would help avoid the surpluses that suppress prices and lead to crises." Under this instrument, the dairy market would first be studied closely, to then be eased and kept in balance using a three-step programme (central element: voluntary production cuts) in the case of foreseeable crises.

Is the MRP, therefore, an alternative to proposals like futures markets or easier access to finance put forth by the EU Task Force? "The MRP is, in fact, the better alternative by a long shot. This is because the Task Force proposals have one major failing: They do not address overproduction, which is at the heart of the problems on the dairy market," says van Keimpema. Futures markets are based on the real dairy market - the spot market. If good milk prices are not achieved here, even futures markets cannot provide any sort of compensation. If the access to loans is facilitated in spite of these low prices, all they will achieve is continued overproduction and surpluses. This would end up supressing milk prices even further. "This, in turn, makes it even more difficult to pay back loans - leading to a debt spiral," states a concerned van Keimpema who clearly adds: "Production costs must be covered 100 percent. Therefore, let's finally do the right thing and implement the MRP for the dairy market!"



EMB Vice President Sieta van Keimpema (EN, NL, DE): +31 6 12 16 80 00
EMB Press Office Silvia Däberitz (EN, FR, DE): +32 (0)2808 1936

Download press release (PDF)

More News


"A narrow perspective is something we absolutely cannot afford"

The International Pooling Commission of Milk Producers calls on EU policymakers to stop ignoring important aspects of the dairy sector


Better into butter?

The dairy market is currently seeing a surprising development: Since the beginning of the year, farm-gate prices paid to dairy farmers have stagnated or are showing only very modest increases, and milk protein is difficult to sell, among other reasons because of the 350,000 tons of milk powder the EU put into storage during the...


European Fair Milk Conference puts innovative projects by milk producers in the spotlight

The Golden Faironika was awarded to a number of winners – in the “Policymaker” category, this year’s winners were former French Agriculture Minister Stéphane Le Foll and Lower Saxony’s Agriculture Minister Christian Meyer


Newsletter June online!

The Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) is to be reformed by 2020 to be better adjusted to society’s wishes. Since the topic is very important for farmers, I attend the meetings of the Civil Dialogue Group on the Common Agriculture Policy on behalf of EMB. Read more


4th European Fair Milk Conference in Germany

Invitation to the conference on 14 June 2017 in Würzburg, Bavaria


335 euros as honest price threshold for intervention milk powder

(Brussels, 15/05/17) There was too much milk powder in the past and still the milk market cannot cope with it: there are currently some 350,000 tons of skimmed milk powder stored in intervention, and in view of the tense situation in the EU milk market that volume lies as heavy as lead in the stomach. Although at present raw...


Newsletter May online!

Butter is expensive and milk powder is cheap. On this basis, dairies pay low settlement prices that have remained practically unchanged. The price difference between protein and fat is abnormally high and  the large EU intervention stock is immediately blamed for the low powder price. Is this correct? Read more