Newsletter as PDF
Contact
EMB - European Milk Board asbl
Rue de la Loi 155
B-1040 Bruxelles
Tel.: +32 - 2808 - 1935
Fax: +32 - 2808 - 8265
Dear dairy farmers, dear interested parties,
Although we're already a good month into the new year, I would still like to wish you all the very best and good health for 2023. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank all EMB members who supported my election as President of the European Milk Board at the General Assembly in December 2022. I will do my utmost to defend the values and vision of our organisation, starting with this contribution to our bimonthly newsletter.
Every year holds a new set of challenges and 2023 will be no different. The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions will likely be costly for dairy farmers, and yet the new CAP takes even more money away from us, leaving little scope for mitigation measures. As you all know, the end of 2020 saw the adoption of the EU’s European Climate Law as part of the European Green Deal, which defines more ambitious climate targets for 2030. By then, greenhouse gas emissions are to be reduced by 55% compared to 1990. In order to reach these goals, agriculture will have to contribute to mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, but the cost increase this means for dairy farmers leaves little leeway for our colleagues to become greener.
Recently, in Denmark, the new CAP reform was translated in new rules and regulations for farmers. As a result, dairy farmers are losing payments from milk production and the slaughter of young bulls, steers, heifers and cows. The latter compensations are replaced by a coupled payment in a range between 16 to 20 euros per cow and per year. For Denmark, this payment has been set at 18 euros per cow and per year. In addition, dairy farmers must ensure that 4% of their land is untilled, for example fallow surfaces, field edges, small biotopes and field shrubs.
Farmers can apply for various agricultural schemes such as planting environmentally and climate-friendly grass, varying their crops (beets, pulses, potatoes, etc.), enhancing biodiversity and sustainability on their farms (having more untilled land than the mandatory minimum of 4%), practicing extensification through yearly cuts (this only applies to peaty soils) and supporting organic farming practices.
The difficulty for many dairy farmers lies in the fact that pasture areas will shrink by at least 4%, while the standard admissible amount of phosphorus excreted by a dairy cow has increased by 9%, regardless of the feed ration. The upper limit of phosphorus that may be used per hectare makes things even more difficult in Denmark. It often excludes the use of starter P-fertilizer for sprouting maize plants, weakening them at their early stage and rendering them more vulnerable to various challenges. The expected decrease in yield per hectare, which inevitably impacts farmers’ income, has yet to be addressed by policy makers.
This newsletter features a number of contributions that explore the topic of the European Green Deal, alongside other articles on recurring topics such as the milk price and GMO-free milk. We hope you enjoy reading this newsletter.
Kjartan Poulsen, EMB president
Market indicators (on 30/01/2023)
Key indicators in the dairy sector point to a downward trend on the market. The average price for Italian spot milk, for example, has fallen by almost 10 cents since December 2022 and was at 54.08 cents per kg of milk by the end of January. The price in January last year was 44.75 cents.
October 2022 in Germany: Milk production costs covered
Long-term cost coverage is a basic prerequisite for stable production. According to the quarterly updated cost study by the Bureau for Rural Sociology and Agriculture (BAL), the production costs for October 2022 amounted to 47.51 cents per kg, while the average farm-gate milk price in the same period was 59.33 cents per kg. This means that the costs were covered during this period. As can be seen from the development of milk production costs in the past years, cost coverage was achieved only a few months earlier – in July 2022 – for the first time since the study came into existence.
Read more...The Green Deal, or how to keep asking more of farmers
The three regulations that create the framework for the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) were adopted in 2018 and to a certain extent, they are the technical and legal provisions that serve to achieve a political vision and environmental ambitions that were only defined in 2019-2020. Besides the fact that the technical and financial means are not adapted to the goals set out in the strategies developed by the European Commission, these strategies were not subject to any prior impact assessment or evaluation before they were announced.
Read more...APLI position regarding the Green Deal
APLI (the French association of independent milk producers) defends the interests of dairy farmers without denying the existing climatic challenges. In fact, climate change is leading to more frequent events with negative consequences for producers (drought, floods etc.). Hence we fully understand why the EU wishes to have an agricultural sector that is increasingly carbon-neutral and environmentally friendly.
Read more...Effects of Green Deal on Ireland impossible to predict in detail – but overall production will certainly fall
The EU’s Green Deal proposal envisages a carbon-neutral EU by 2050 to be achieved through changes across a range of sectors, with Irish agriculture playing a significant role in Ireland’s response. The EU Green Deal has set targets to halt biodiversity decline, improve water quality, and to reduce fertiliser and pesticide use.
Read more...European Green Deal in Luxembourg
In December 2019, the European Commission published a communication about the European Green Deal. The goal of this instrument is to bring about a transition towards a modern, resource-efficient, and competitive economy.
Read more....Let’s seize the opportunity!
It is safe to say that what the European Commission is planning to undertake with its ‘Farm to Fork’ strategy (F2F) is quite novel. It aims to reduce nutrient loss in the EU by at least 50% by 2030, while maintaining soil fertility. The same is foreseen for pesticide use as well. In addition, according to the F2F strategy, the share of organic farming should increase to 25%.
Read more...Echoing the European Green Deal in Norway
Although Norway is not a member of the European Union, the Norwegian government has come to a similar conclusion as the European Green Deal and thinks that agriculture must play a substantial role in the transition to a sustainable (near) future.
Read more...Reality check a major blow to political objectives
The objective of having a regional, independent, and sustainable agriculture cannot be reached with the current EU policy. Reforms are urgently needed!
* More independence and better food security
* More regional production
* Small and medium-sized farms, along with greener farms, should be the backbone of European agriculture
* Consistently sustainable farming
Numerous are those – farmers, consumers, and political representatives – who fully support such an image of agriculture. It depicts an optimistic future that will equally benefit consumers, producers, and the EU as a whole. As the European Milk Board’s (EMB) Executive Committee representatives highlighted during their press conference at this year’s International Green Week in Berlin, this idea of our future agriculture is, in fact, far from being realistic. Quite the contrary. A large part of the political aspirations and strategies that shape the agricultural sector go against these objectives. Portraying these very objectives as wishful thinking is probably the most apt description they can be given.
This farming sector lacks a solid bedrock
Instead of having a healthy production structure, the EU farming system is eroding and has seen a drastic reduction in the number of farms in Europe, falling from 15 to 10 million between 2003 and 2016. And this trend is set to continue in the coming years, those most affected by these developments being small and medium-sized farms. In spite of the difficult work farmers carry out, considerably lower profit margins and a meagre income are taking their toll on the sector, pushing farms to close down and depriving younger generations of any prospects of starting their own business.
EMB President Kjartan Poulsen also fails to see any potential for a sustainable change given the current developments: “Although the milk price is currently higher than usual and costs are covered for the first time in some regions, this does not make up for the major losses farmers have incurred over the past decades.” On top of that, costs are increasing exponentially, and the prospect of prices soon being lowered means that their income will, once again, be put under enormous pressure. As he pointed out, the major political objectives cannot be reached if the sector does not undergo any reforms or isn’t stabilised in a consistent manner.
These regulations, measures and reforms play an essential role in reforming the EU’s farming sector:
- EU-wide legislation banning the selling of products below their cost of production
- An actual involvement of farmers in developing concepts and implementing the Green Deal, and providing them with adequate tools
- Adequate crisis instruments in the EU agricultural system
- Different objectives and a different structure for the CDG Milk and the MMO (Milk Market Observatory)
- Strong horizontal producer organisations that pool producers for a better negotiating position, without exception for cooperatives
- Mirror clauses in the EU’s trade rules
- Removing agriculture from the WTO and free-trade agreements
- Openly strengthen and expand the Fair Milk projects in the EU
“The EU is able to come up with very ambitious goals for the current agricultural policy”, says EMB Vice-President Elmar Hannen regarding current political practices. “But when these aspirations collide with reality because the wrong course has been set, or because the right course has not been set, then neither we farmers nor the consumers will benefit from the catchy slogans that these goals actually are. We need these reforms in the EU so that we stop losing producers. Agricultural production in the EU can indeed become more independent, sustainable and self-sufficient - but only with our farmers.”
Details of the proposed reforms:
-
An EU-wide regulation banning the selling of products below their cost of production
Why?
What is obvious in other sectors – that costs are passed on and reflected in the price – is not a given in, for example, the dairy sector. It is clear that the invisible hand is pushing prices below the cost line. An EU regulation banning this cost shortfall would stabilise farmers’ income and the production structure in the entire EU.
-
An actual involvement of farmers in the development of concepts and in the implementation of the Green Deal, and providing them with the adequate tools
Why?
As it stands, farmers do not take part in developing the Green Deal. The objectives are dictated to them, and they are expected to bear the additional financial burden generated by these strategies with their already extremely low income. This needs to change. Producers must be placed at the heart of agricultural strategies and must take part in their development. Climate change cannot be fought without the help of farmers. The Green Deal must be used as a tool to reform the current system and turn it into a socially sustainable model.
-
Adequate crisis instruments must be integrated into the EU agricultural system. These includes a functioning early warning mechanism that works with the right indicators which reflect the true production costs and provide for an adequate producer income.
Why?
Over the past years, the milk market has had to address a number of successive crises. A surplus in production led to prices plummeting and forced many producers out of business. These crises can be avoided, or even mitigated, if they are addressed early enough with the right mechanisms such as, for example, a volume reduction scheme that counters overproduction. This is an effective solution which bore fruit when it was deployed in the EU in 2016-2017.
-
Different objectives and a different structure for the CDG Milk and the MMO (Milk Market Observatory) which should both actively focus on a balanced and fair distribution of added value.
Why?
The establishment of the MMO was a major milestone in the dairy sector. However, the MMO’s mandate and tasks unfortunately do not go far enough. The MMO must be turned into an institution aimed at preventing and mitigating crises. The same goes for the EU’s Civil Dialogue Groups during which stakeholders from the EU Commission and from the dairy sector exchange insights. Exchanging data and experiences is essential, but if no action is taken based on the expertise drawn from these meetings, no improvements can be made in the sector.
-
Strong horizontal producer organisations that, without the exception of cooperatives, pool producers for a better negotiating position
Why?
Strong producer organisations are strong negotiation partners when it comes to negotiating producer prices with dairies. Such an organisation can only have such power if it brings together producers and negotiates with several dairies, i.e., if it is horizontally structured. So-called “vertical” producer associations dependent on one dairy will never have the ability to develop such clout.
-
Mirror clauses that guarantee that imported food and feed comply with EU requirements. Their compliance must also be ensured through sufficient controls and sanctions.
Why?
When imported goods have not been produced according to the same environmental regulations as those produced in the EU, they cause damage at several levels. They can undercut the EU-made products because of their lower production costs, which are due to their lower environmental standards and, as such, drive them out of the market. The low level of costs also leads to an outsourcing of the production to third countries, which generates greater environmental damage there, and this for goods that are consumed within the EU.
-
Reduce the dependency on imports and cheap, harmful exports by removing agriculture from the WTO and free-trade agreements
Why?
A responsible EU trade policy should no longer allow cheap products to be dumped onto sensitive markets as this practice destroys farmers’ livelihoods and sources of income in other States. By becoming increasingly dependent on imports, we will be hampering efforts aimed at having EU food sovereignty and food security, will have a debilitating impact on our own production structures and will be promoting shipping practices that pollute the environment.
-
Openly strengthen and expand the Fair Milk project in the EU
Why?
Fair Milk is a leading example. This project enables its participants to receive cost-covering prices, which also provides them with a fair income. Although this project is already in full swing in countries such as France, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and Switzerland, they do not yet reach enough consumers and producers. Fair Milk has a positive impact on the life and livelihood of farmers, and it should therefore be extended so that more producers can benefit from it. Here, the EU can contribute to this project by publicly recognising its benefits.
EMB press release of 19 January 2023
Latvian milk price is the third lowest in the EU
Although the average purchase price of milk in Latvia reached 0.49 euros per litre at the end of last year, the farm-gate price paid to Latvian dairy producers was still the third lowest in the European Union (EU). We call on the new Minister of Agriculture to set a goal: Latvian milk should attain at least the same price purchase as Lithuanian milk.
Read more...Modest milk price increase in Switzerland
As of 1 January 2023, the milk interbranch organisation has increased the reference price for A-milk (i.e. the protected segment) by 3 centimes. At the same time, however, deductions under the “raw material price reduction” fund have also increased by 2 centimes.
Read more...News from BDM in Germany
The German dairy farmers’ association (BDM) was again very active towards the end of the year. After an interval of many years, we put up a stand at the Eurotier 2022 trade fair and it garnered much interest. At a joint EMB and BDM strategy meeting in Hanover, participants from ten countries discussed the future direction of the EMB. The importance of such discussions is showcased by the fact that the milk price is expected to fall once again in 2023.
Read more...Legal notice
European Milk Board asbl
Rue de la Loi 155
B-1040 Bruxelles
Tel: +32 2808 1935
Fax: +32 2808 8265
E-Mail: office@europeanmilkboard.org
Website: http://www.europeanmilkboard.org
